How to Use the Members Only Section

SEARCH DTT

DIGEST

NEWSBYTES

by date

ANALYSES

KEY DOCUMENTS

Jiang-Yeltsin Joint Statement 

Jiang-Putin Beijing Declaration

UN International Financial Architecture

DTT INFORMATION

Discerning the Times  

  •  
    6 Heather Road
  • Bangor, ME 04401
     

    Phone

    (207) 945-9878

     

    email
    DTT@discerningtoday.org
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    May-June, 2001      Volume 3, Issue 5-6

    Foot-and-mouth disease: An act of terrorism?
    © 2000 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes 

    Little by little the pieces of the complex jig saw puzzle known as the 2001 Foot-and-mouth disease epidemic are beginning to fall into place, and a disturbing picture is taking shape. There have now been 1624 cases of FMD diagnosed in Great Britain, and over 3 million animals have been slaughtered. It all happened so suddenly and steamrolled the UK countryside with such force, that there was little time for investigation. But now in the relative lull in outbreaks, new details as to the origin of the disease pose some serious questions.

    The origin

    The disease, which first broke out on Feb. 20, 2001, at a UK pig farm, was originally attributed to contaminated illegal foreign meat smuggled in for the Chinese restaurant trade, and later added to pigswill. But on April 29, the Electronic Telegraph cited new evidence that portrayed the Army as the source of the current epidemic. "The admission that imported Army meat went to the farm at Heddon-on-the-Wall is the first time that a potential path of infection has been identified," stated the Telegraph. Tim Yeo, a Tory agriculture spokesman, described the Army's disclosure as "a very serious matter". He added: "I never believed that the smear against the Chinese restaurants had any foundation, and it now appears to have been an attempt to divert attention away from the real culprit." Could this monumental blunder be an accident?

    Other suspicious pieces of the puzzle cropped up in a story covered by the Electronic Telegraph on March 25 which disclosed that the European Commission ordered the immediate testing of all its stock of foot and mouth vaccine in January a month before the outbreak occurred. The same article quoted timber merchants in Staffordshire who said that they were asked by Ministry of Agriculture officials in January if they could supply timber for burning animals. Line One then made the stunning announcement on April 8 that a vial of FMD was stolen from a lab two months before the outbreak began, and could have been released deliberately. 

    On May 15, National Farmers Union president Ben Gill claimed in the Guardian Unlimited that eco-terrorists may have deliberately triggered the foot and mouth epidemic in Britain and other outbreaks around the world. "There is no doubt foot and mouth spread to the UK illegally and, unfortunately, we cannot rule out eco-terrorism," he said. The idea was vehemently denied by environmental groups.

    The objective

    But the most frightening piece of the picture came from Cutting Edge on April 26. The claim was made that there seemed to be an eerie parallel between the FMD killing zones, and the UN Biosphere zones. The map comparisons seem to suggest the possibility that the UN Biosphere plan could be implemented through this horrific disease, an idea that Discerning the Times introduced in a March 3 analysis

    Animal rights groups and environmental activists have long blamed mankind for all of Earth's woes. In order to "re-wild" the earth (i.e. restore it to the pristine condition that it had before man destroyed it), humans must be removed or restrained. This epidemic has managed to drive a full 1/3 of UK farmers to throw in the towel, and thousands of sheep have been removed from grazing areas. "The loss of sheep from hillsides as a result of foot-and-mouth epidemic may be good for the rural environment," said Morgan Parry, head of the Worldwide Fund For the Future (WWF) in Wales. (As you may have guessed, Mr. Parry does not make a living raising sheep.) By forcing farmers off their lands, many may have no choice but to sell out to the government at fire-sale prices, enabling the government to create reserves from them. So far, there is no solid evidence to connect all the dots, but there are certainly suspects under the "umbrella of suspicion." 

    Whether this is Prime Minister Blair's attempt to implement the UN Biodiversity plan through a military-sponsored release of the virus, eco-terrorists who want to save Mother Earth, or just plain coincidence, the effects may all be the same. Governmental controls are increasing, and plans are being made in parts of the United States to declare martial law, if or when the disease strikes here. The biggest losers in this battle are the farmers, who have had their livelihoods stripped away and watched in horror as healthy animals were slaughtered needlessly. Pray that the Lord will richly supply their needs during this trying time. V bm