How to Use the Members Only Section

SEARCH DTT

DIGEST

NEWSBYTES

by date

ANALYSES

KEY DOCUMENTS

Jiang-Yeltsin Joint Statement 

Jiang-Putin Beijing Declaration

UN International Financial Architecture

DTT INFORMATION

Discerning the Times  

  •  
    6 Heather Road
  • Bangor, ME 04401
     

    Phone

    (207) 945-9878

     

    email
    DTT@discerningtoday.org
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

    Volume 3 Issue 7-8, July-August 2001

    Slobodan's extradition to The Hague destabilizes Yugoslavia
    © 2001 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
    Slobodan Milosevic in court
    During his indictment at The Hague, Slobodan Milosevic blamed NATO for war crimes. "I consider this tribunal a false tribunal and the indictments false indictments... This trial’s aim is to produce false justification for the war crimes of NATO committed in Yugoslavia." While Milosevic is right, he should nonetheless be tried, within Yugoslavia, not The Hague. 

    The globalists finally got what they wanted – Slobodan Milosevic to face charges of crimes against humanity in The Hague, Netherlands. The purpose is not to bring justice, but to establish the right of the international community to try and convict (yes, he will be convicted) an international leader for crimes against humanity. This is what the new International Criminal Court is designed to do. Yet, what is the cost?

    Stratfor Intelligence on June 28 warned that the Kosovo fiasco has been a disaster since its beginnings in 1999. The extradition will be the crowning blow that will cause the Yugoslavian federation to finally crumble leaving it in economic shambles. But the international community got what they wanted: The global acceptance that the international community can intervene in the affairs of sovereign nations, whether to bomb the pants off it, destroy its economy, or extradite its leader. 

    Russia believes, however, the trial will backfire on the western leaders, according to the July 6 WorldNetDaily. Moscow has consistently blamed the West for the numerous wars and breakup of Yugoslavia. Moscow attacked the war-crimes tribunal directly asserting that "it's common knowledge" that several of the nations supporting the U.N. war-crimes tribunal in The Hague were also "active supporters of Croatia and the Bosnian Moslems." The official Russian government statement also asserted that the United States has made "every effort to break up the single Yugoslav state." Moscow accuses the US in helping the criminal Kosovo Liberation Front "even before NATO launched its aggression" in 1999 against Yugoslavia. 

    If Slobodan has to face a war tribunal, so should the former American president, claims Russia. "If criminal orders were given by the former president," the entire political and military situation should be taken into account, Moscow said. Indeed, the in-depth May, 1999 issue of Discerning the Times Digest and others since then reveal serious evidence that President Clinton and then NATO Secretary General Javier Solana committed grievous crimes that resulted in the death of more civilians than Slobodan's corrupt police force did in its alleged "ethnic cleansing."

    Slobodan's extradition may destroy Yugoslavia

    Make no mistake, Slobodan deserves to be tried, and probably convicted for a variety of crimes. But, Yugoslavian President Vojislav Kostunica, the constitutional lawyer who replaced Milosevic last year, called his handover to the U.N.'s International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) illegal and unconstitutional, according to the June 29 CNSNews. He must be first tried in Yugoslavia for his crimes. But, that is not what the international community wanted. It wanted to establish the superiority of the War Tribunal process to be superior over state rights, so they first destroyed the economy of Yugoslavia, and then refused to provide economic assistance until Slobodan was extradited.

    Yugoslavian President Kostunica refused to extradite Milosevic on constitutional grounds. Foreign aid was then cut off to Yugoslavia putting it into an economic crisis. So Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic led a velvet coup to do an end run around Kostunica by handing over Slobodan to The Hague so they could receive the economic aid from the international community. Never mind that it was the international community that destroyed their economy in the first place. In the process, Djindjic has marginalized the federal government, and it will probably fail, leaving the two poverty stricken nations of Serbia and Montenegro. Serbia will be the big loser because it is now land-locked and has no way of shipping its products abroad.

    If you didn't know it before, Yugoslavia offers a clear-cut case of how the globalists intend to override national constitutions and destroying the nation if needed to implement their world government. What this means to Americans is that our US Constitution is irrelevant to these globalists.

    Such is the future we can look forward to with global governance.   V mc