| |
| Bridge
to a One-World Religion: The Foundation |
| © 2000 Discerning
the Times Digest and NewsBytes
Pittsburgh, PA, known as a city of many bridges, will
boast the addition of yet one more on June 26, 2000, as tens of thousands
of religious leaders from around the world are expected to gather for a
week long conference to sign the international United Religions Initiative
(URI) Charter–bringing a single world religion one step closer to
reality.
Previously based in San Francisco, the URI was
encouraged to move its headquarters to Pittsburgh by request of a major
foundation which supplied an enticing grant of $1.7 million. The symbolic
significance of this new location is expressed by California Bishop
William E. Swing, founder of URI: "We’re a bridge-building
organization, and Pittsburgh is the place with the most bridges in North
America." URI officials assert that it is the logical place to
adopt a Charter which unites the world’s religions. Interestingly, prior
to the compulsion to relocate, URI leadership considered it equally
imperative that the Charter be signed in the San Francisco Fairmont Hotel,
where the UN Charter was signed in 1945.
Bishop Swing, of Grace Episcopal Cathedral in San
Francisco, was first approached by the United Nations (UN) in 1993 to lead
an interfaith worship service commemorating the 50th
anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter in that city. This sparked
his determination to "commit the rest of my life to an initiative
that would create a United Religions which would, in appropriately
spiritual ways, parallel the United Nations." The celebration
took place on June 25, 1995, where Swing formally introduced his plan for
a United Religions Initiative to the public. Since that time, URI has
sponsored a number of elaborate, apparently well-funded worldwide events,
regional conferences, and global summits.
 |
The bridge to a one-world religion, however, began over
100 years ago with a meeting of The World’s Parliament of Religions in
Chicago in 1893. Since the creation of the UN in the 1940s, every decade
has pursued proposals for a United Religions on a global scale, including
the World Council of Churches, formed in 1948; Vatican II in 1962; the
World Conference on Religion and Peace in 1970; and the 1993 Parliament of
the World’s Religions. None has gained momentum and support as quickly
as the current URI.
Swing fine-tuned his sales pitch and traveled around
the world for three months in 1996, while promoting his vision by holding
discussions with people from many varied beliefs. He seeks to bring
together representatives from all 258 religions in the world, as well as
"spiritual traditions" and "indigenous peoples," into
a United Religions which functions similarly to the United Nations. Their
broad, open-arms policy welcomes faiths such as Buddhist, Zoroastrian,
Muslim, Wiccan, atheist, Druid, Baha’i, Goddess worship, and Taoist,
while Christianity and Judaism are only included with great reservation.
It’s a "one faith fits all" mentality–almost.
Fundamentalists, such as Christians and Jews who
believe in the Ten Commandments or worship a single God, are considered
threats to global peace and are frequently warned against
"proselytizing" (i.e. evangelizing), as specified in principle
#21 of the Charter: "Members of the URI shall not be coerced to
participate in any ritual or be proselytized." In his 1998 book, The
Coming United Religions, Bishop Swing groups those who proselytize
with those who are "condemning, murdering and dominating."
Not surprisingly, the Prince of Peace is soundly eliminated from the
global peace process.
Christians’ monotheistic view of God and their belief
in salvation through Jesus Christ alone makes them diametrically opposed
to URI principles, whose pluralistic outlook regards all spiritual paths
as means to a common end. It seems that even the United Religions has a
limit to their tolerance policy. Principle #2 in their Charter states
"We respect the sacred wisdom of each religion, spiritual
expression and indigenous tradition" and #3 continues, "We
respect the differences among religions, spiritual expressions and
indigenous traditions," yet Christians are forbidden from
fulfilling the Great Commission to "Go ye into all the world, and
preach the gospel to every creature." (Mark 16:15)
The ever-growing ecumenical movement has been a major
springboard for URI’s plunge into the interfaith realm. While ecumenism
is defined as a uniting of Christian churches, interfaithism is a broader
attempt to unify all of the world’s religions onto some sort of common
ground, namely peace. The URI’s charter declares in paragraph one of its
preamble, purpose and principles "we, people of diverse religions,
spiritual expressions and indigenous traditions throughout the world,
hereby establish the united religions initiative to promote enduring,
daily interfaith cooperation, to end religiously motivated violence and to
create cultures of peace, justice and healing for the earth and all living
things." A very noble undertaking, indeed. But at what cost? If
Christians think they must sacrifice Biblical truths in order to preserve
unity, then it’s time to drop the olive branch and obey the first two
Commandments: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me...for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God." (Exodus 20:3, 5) V bm
Next month: a broader look at the URI and its true agenda.
|
|
|